Tuesday, September 21, 2010

The Fall of a Goddess, Rise of Writing

Summary of Chapter 6: “Cuneiform/ Marduk”

In chapter six Shlain goes through a timeline of event s that has eventually shaped the Patriarchic dominated world we live in today and he begins with the story of the origins of the written word. However, before writing there were pictures. The Sumerians used marks for keeping record purposes only; beginning around 3100 B.C. the first cuneiforms appeared (Schlain 46). Eventually, Sumerians started to write down their language and even created schools to teach the written word. As the status of the scribes grew so did the cities. Then, the Akkadians modified cuneiform. They invented phonograms, which are symbols that stand for syllables in speech. The Akkadians are credited with creating phonetic writing, furthermore, the Akkadians’ even created words for abstract concepts like, justice, destiny, and truth. (Shlain 46) Additionally, the direction of writing became a constant left to right.

Shlain states that the Sumerians believe that cuneiform were a gift from Nisaba the goddess of grain and storage, this particular goddess because cuneiform was thought to be a clever way to store thoughts (47). Superseded by the Akkadian god of Nabu, the god of writing. Slain purposes that Sumerian myths provided women with high status because their queens shared status/power/wealth with kings (47). Some examples of female deities include, Great Goddess Nammu and earth goddess Ki. The sky god (An) and earth goddess (Ki) mated and then one of the most important goddess was born Inanna. Inanna was the sexual goddess that “bestowed fertility and fecundity on mortals” moreover; she controlled the fate of mortals and was the goddess of wisdom (Shlain 47). Inanna lived the life of a “young man” she did not have any domestic duties and she was involved in one of the most important Sumerian rituals called, hiero gamos. Which is the consummating of a sacred marriage vows with Inanna, it is the religious obligation of the Sumerian king. Not only does this legitimize his reign, it is also important for a “successful harvest and necessary to guarantee the fertility of human unions and animal mating” (Schlain 48).

However, there was a power shift from the Sumerians to Akkadians and then the Babylonians. The Seven Tablet of Creation replaced prior creation myths around 1700 B.C. Furthermore, this was considered “the most plausible explanation for how the physical world came into existence” (Schlain 48). It is the story of a Great Goddess Tiamat; Tiamat and her male companion Apsu had an argument and he was then murder by other young gods. At Apsu death Marduk was born, the young gods were terrified of Tiamat and no one would dare attack or challenger her. In spite of this, once Marduk was fully grown he volunteered to fight her but wanted if he won to be named chief (Schlain 49). In the end, Marduk won and slain the Great Goddess Tiamat. This resulted in Marduk using her giant corpse to create the universe by dismembering her (Schlain 49). Additionally, Marduk and gods lack worshipers therefore created mortals. Schlain says the Babylonians embraced this myth of their existence. And mortals were to spend their lives crawling on the surface of Tiamats carcass and providing the gods with food and wine (50). Schlain also states that all societies invented creation stories because people are puzzled with human existence/reasons for death and evil.


The worshiping of Marduk began early 1700 B.C. and written laws became an imperative part of “Western civilization at just the moment that the Babylonian Goddess suffer defeat and dismemberment” (Schlain 51). This is crucial because the deterioration of female power is tied to the dominance of written law.

Schlain goes on to explain that speech is genetically encoded but writing is not and that grammar and laws are controlled by the left brain. Also, with the exception of recent history laws blatantly discriminated females (52). For example, the Mesopotamian Law Code (2350 B.C.) stated that if women took two husbands they would be stoned (Schlain 52). Finally, Shlain also points out that at this time the patriarchy dominated written documents increase thousand fold. And Hammurabi’s code greatly restricted women’s rights, especially their sexual freedoms. Veiling and chaperones became common for women. Lastly Schlain suggests Tiamats downfall directly corresponded with Hammurabi’s code (52).

Analysis of Rhetorical Appeals:

In chapter six I don’t think Schlain kept up with his use of ethos. I feel that his credibility is tainted a little. Chapter six is lacking some of the outside sources that Schlain used in previous chapters. While reading, I often wondered “where is he getting this information?” However, I think that Schlains has a stronger logos appeal because of his use of dates. He uses reasons and sounds logical. Finally, I think in this type of writing it is hard to appeal to the readers emotions or have strong pathos.

Question:

- Schlain emphasizes the timing of the Babylonians’ myth of Tiamat and Marduk to the reason of why patriarchy (social organization in which the father is the supreme authority) emerged. Do you think there are other possible explanations? What are they?


Work cited:
Shlain, Leonard. “Cuneiform/Marduk.” The Alphabet Versus the Goddess: The Conflict Between Word and Image. New York: Penguin / Compass, 1998. Pp.45-52.
http://www.hiddenmeanings.com/mother.htm

11 comments:

  1. I feel like the timing of the Babylonians' myth of Tiamat and Marduk encouraged the development of patriarchy, but is not entirely responsible. The emergence of patriarchy in the family unit is a complicated thing to try to explain. The myth could have helped enforce these roles further, but as Shlain claims the process of building a patriarchy in society is a long complicated process that involves written language, myths and stories, and the emergence of male Gods as well as the destroying of females Goddesses as well as female power symbols.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree with what Paula said, I do think the timing definitely pushed the patriarchy. I also think that once the females started to become more prominent in society the males couldn't handle it so in turn they needed to "create" a myth to prove that they needed to be in full power. As the chapter starts off the several different goddesses have all the power and control everything such as harvest and wisdom. I think that this is also a factor in why patriarchy emerged.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Another way patriarchal society started could've been due to men historically being the hunters. The act of killing food for their family was the most important thing for survival, and thus the family respected the father. That respect combined with males being bigger could have resulted in a patriarchal society.

    ReplyDelete
  4. i think that when laws were created there were many that suppressed women because the men were stronger and thought it should be that way. i really do not think it had anything to do with the fact that writing is controlled by the "masculine side of the brain."

    ReplyDelete
  5. I also believe that the myth could be mainly responsible for the rise of the patriarchy system. However, i don't think that the myth completely responsible for the patriarchy system. There are many other things that could be responsible for that. For instance, the worshiping of only male Gods as opposed to female ones. Or just the overall ruling class of males over females. I think the myth might have had something to do with the degrading of the females, but it wasn't fully responsible.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Marissa, thank you for this summary and rhetorical analysis.

    I think the Tiamat Marduk story Schail summarizes in this chapter is a reflection of the cultural, ideological, and social changes taking place in Mesopotamia in this period. So, in response to your question, I think many other things caused and contributed to the rise of misogyny. This story is one of those things that, like any culture's myths, solidified, reinforced, and perpetuated these ideals. But it alone did not cause the problem. It is only a vehicle for helping to deliver it ...

    A note on Isaac's point: it is important to understand that ancient Sumer worshipped Goddesses and priestesses presided at temples. Women participated in civic leadership and authority. And, incidentally, I believe (I will have to double check this) the first image or representation of a deity of writing (a scribe) we have to date is female. Which complicates Schlain's argument in an interesting way.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I also agree with the fact that I think that the time of which it was, really made patriarchy. Which makes me believe that females were starting to if not already, having a little bit of power. So the men of the society developed a way to "in a sense", to still keep that power by creating stories. In this chapter t was discussed that the Goddesses had all of the power, and that's where I think the idea of patriarchy really took off to another level and really created it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What Shlain states in this chapter offers a good explanation for the rise of patriarchy. This is keeping with all that Shlain has said so far about the suppression of the female goddess. This myth of Tiamat and Marduk reinforces the point that the emergence of the written word has helped to suppress the idea of a female goddess. However, there was probably more at work. Other comments spoke of the beginnings of worshipping a male god versus a female one. This probably started the rise of patriarchy, and the importance of men's roles in the household reinforced it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I think men are afraid of women because we have the power to provide them with a child and they don't. So men probably tried to sneak themselves in whenever possible (like the babylonian Tiamat and Marduk propaganda) to take power away from women because they felt inferior. If men make women think that we are inferior and need them then maybe we will believe it and give them what they need. It's kind of like the Napoleon syndrome they're reproductively inept so they work extra hard and make life difficult for other people just to prove themselves worthy.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The story of Tiamat and Marduk is interesting to me. It seems that the story was created after a real-life event. My thinking is Tiamat was the wife and co-leader of the Babylonian society, and when she murdered her husband, gained full control of the society. Apparently the people were terrified of her, so when Marduk finally killed her, the Babylonians vowed never again, and therefore diminished the rights of women. This is pretty far-fetched but I can definitely see it happening. I also believe the fact that men brought home the kills from the hunt contributed to patriarchy. Without his meat, the family wouldn't be able to survive.

    ReplyDelete