Sunday, October 3, 2010

Susie Gerard

English 308J

10/5/10

Chapter 8à Alphabet Originates from an unlikely source

Shlains eighth chapter in The Alphabet vs. The Goddess titled alph/bet, is about the history of the alphabet focusing on its pros an cons, its connection to the fall of the goddess and its origin. Shlain describes how the alphabet was u

nconventional, because it was easy to learn in contrast to the Egyptian and Mesopotamian complicated equivalents. Egyptian and Mesopotamian scribes also hid their written language from the general public because, to be literate was to have power weather you were rich or poor. Shlain argues that the alphabet ended the dominance of the literate upper class. Shlain also points out that although the alphabet evened the playing field for literacy, it changed religion in a way that essentially extinguished the goddess. Religions once required its followers to see the image of their god, with the a

dvent of the alphabet, “to know the deity demanded that one must first read His written words.” (65) Shlain makes the argument that even though the cultures using the alphabet accomplished all varieties of sophisticated and new age technology, they also, “for the first time in recorded history” (66) had disputes and war. The alphabet allowed people to organize and structure knowledge and think abstractly since all forms of writing strengthen left brain dominance. Shlain is sure that since the alphabet doesn’t resemble the idea its trying to convey it moves from the all at once way of thinking to the one at a time mental processing, since we read words a letter at a time to know what the word is. Ultimately in Shlains mind the introduction of the alphabet led to left brain dominance, abstract thinking and turning away from worshiping goddesses they could see to worshiping abstract male gods.

Chapter 8 is also concerned with the origins of the alphabet. Reference books say that Phoenicians were the creators of the alphabet because the earliest Greek historian, Herodotus, wrote that it was the Phoenicians who introduced writing to the Greeks. Shlain remains unconvinced because the Phoenicians were dull normal people with plain lifestyles. The only thing that can be credited to the Phoenicians was their navy and the only thing written about them was from their enemies who conquered them. He also argues that since all

other forms of writing were from creative and impressive cultures very unlike the Phoenician people. Shlain suggests that the alphabet came instead from the Habiru or Midianite nomadic people who were roaming the Sinai Desert. Hebrew letters were found in 1905 at the site of an Egyptian Goddess temple. The rocks with the letters on them were said to be from around 1800 B.C., which is older than the evidence found supporting the Phoenician theory. Shlain also points out the coincidence that the only event with the Sinai Desert was that this was the place where Yahweh gave Moses the 10 commandments and the old testament of the bible is the oldest known book.

In reading Shlains chapter 8 of The Alphabet Versus The Goddess, I have had a variety of rhetorical reactions. I think that Shlain is a well read, creative individual, but I also don’t know if he is really an authority on the subject. I think the foundations on which he is basing his theories are accurate and his theories are plausible, but not entirely convincing. Shlain seems to give a brief historical background to set the scene in the most favorable way for his evidence to be portrayed, but I think there is a lot more going on than he discloses. Although it would be impossible to put enough historical background facts into this book to make it holistic, the brief historical account he mentions is incomplete, and in some places irrelevant. For example, he spent about 3 pages talking about who he thought didn’t invent the alphabet and only about 2 paragraphs on the people he thought did invent it. The three pages about the people he thought didn’t invent the alphabet were full of negative images of those people but he was still associating them with the alphabet which suggests to me that he is just trying to convey a negative connotation with the alphabet. Since he doesn’t even think that they created it why did he have to spend three pages dissing Phoenicians? Shlain makes the argument that, “all forms of writing increase the left brain’s dominance over the right.” (67) I just don’t agree with this. I feel like yes the left brain is strengthened when we use our cones instead of our rods, our left hand instead of our right and concrete abstract thinking, but I think that there is a lot going on with writing that isn’t only in the left brain. When you write you need to draw on a lot of experiences and complex emotions and feelings from your past. Also writing is a way to put on paper those before intangible things that the right brain is famous for. Maybe it’s impossible to recreate that feeling with one word, but through detailed and creative descriptive writing you can try, and many writers have been very successful in doing so. People who have experienced this same feeling know what they are talking about and are taken to it. They feel that “all at once” feeling that was conveyed to them “one at a time.” I wasn’t sure how I felt about the last page, which kind of suggested that the alphabet somehow came from god because the first written letters came from the same place where the Ten Commandments were and that the oldest book was the Old Testament. I mean that’s strange because if they did… then… is he trying to say that the alphabet was made as some evil plot from a misogynistic mystical person who people still worship even to this day. I know he didn’t directly say this, but if you put his argument in context that’s what it kind of sounds like and it’s a little unsettling.


Question: What was your reaction to reading the last two pages of chapter 8 about how the first written letters came from the same place as the Ten Commandments and the connection that the Old Testament is the oldest written book?

Image from: The Ten Commandments. Web. 2 October. 2010. http://www.scott- warner.com/TenCommandments.html.

Book: Shlain, Leonard. “Aleph/ Bet.” The Alphabet Versus the Goddess: The Conflict Between Word and Image. New York: Penguin / Compass, 1998. Pp. 64-71.

8 comments:

  1. Schlain says “It seems like an extraordinary coincidence and a striking intersection of myth and science that the oldest alphabet was found in the place where the seminal episode in the history if the ancient Hebrews occurred.” One of my first thoughts after reading the last two pages of chapter eight was to me that’s not an “extraordinary coincidence” that’s God doing. I definitely do not have the historical knowledge to prove or disprove where, when, and how written language began, but I don’t think anyone has that answer. It is all speculation, Schlain presents it one way and someone else may present in a different light. We can gather all the pieces we can and put them together to try to image what happen in 1800 B.C., but will we ever really know?

    ReplyDelete
  2. My reaction to the last two pages written in chapter 8 is simple. Of coarse the first written document is the Ten Commandments. I feel if God sent a message, of coarse it would become common knowledge and form into the first alphabet, because God had an important message and he conveyed it in a way that all people could learn to interpret. It seems logical to me because the most effective form of communication over long periods of time is written language. The fact that Schlain infers that this is some kind of plot my power hungry men to establish power by creating a single God seems pretty far fetched to me, but this is also coming from someone who believes in God.

    ReplyDelete
  3. For chapter 8 Schlain discusses the Ten Commandments. When God did this I believe he gave basic beliefs to which we form certain things like the alphabet. He did this because it gave humans a way to get meanings across, and commuincate. Schlain expresses all his theories, some backed up by more fact than other's but after all of it is backed up it comes to 1 basic knowledge of how Schlain thinks as well as write.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with what Marissa said how do we know where the words came from that wrote the bible. No one really knows its all facts that people try to piece together and say it came for this specific person at this time in history. Everyone has there own beliefs and opinions to how this all was created/started. I think Schlain tries to make a good point on to where it all started, but once again its his beliefs and his theories.

    ReplyDelete
  5. When Shlain says, "The key is that Yahweh expected all His chosen people to read what He had written," it brings to mind the fact that literacy is a lynch-pin in society. For everyone to understand fully what is going on in society, be it religious or social, one must be able to read the current communications. At the time of the appearance of the alphabet, the only communication coming out was the Ten Commandments and the Old Testament. In order for these ideas to spread past the immediate area of the Sinai Desert, a more effective way for communication was required, other than spoken words and hieroglyphs. The alphabet provided the easy yet effective way to communicate visually.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think that it is an extraordinary coincidence about the ten commandments and the old testament coming about in the same time/area. I do not believe that the alphabet came from the ten commandments. The origin of the alphabet is unknown, but I believe in the power of society and advancing cultures. Humans got to where we are today by constantly forming new ideas and testing them. The human brain is the most powerful force on earth, I believe it was put to use.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Much of the chapter has to do with who created the alphabet and when did it happen? What is most interesting to me is when Shlain writes of Egypt's and Mesopotamia's secrets of the written word. "One who is literate had an immense advantage over those who were not." (Shlain 65) I think this is a bold statement, and the fact that it has carried true from the beginning of the alphabet to now is very powerful. Schlain writes of the glorification of war, sexist attitudes, abused nature etc. that go hand and hand with the alphabet. Before the alphabet people were on an equal playing ground and, yes, did glorify nature and the goddess.
    No matter who created the alphabet the Ten Commandments and God emerged. This diety and these rules are what people live by, what the fight over, what people kill for. Were God and the Ten Commandments created hand in hand with the alphabet to neutralize the demise of humanity that followed the advent of the alphabet? I think Schlain does spend to much time talking about who created it and what the first text was, rather than why it was created.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I find Shalin's theory on the invention of the alphabet to be extremely fascinating. I have never heard this theory before. "It seems like an extraordinary coincidence... that the oldest alphabet was found in the place where the seminal episode in the history of the ancient Hebrews occurred" he states. However, I believe that it is in fact just a coincidence that "the first book written in alphabet is the Old Testament." This could be merely because no one was ever bothered before that to write anything that would contribute to the shaping of the Bible, not because the alphabet was not around at this time. I have attended a Catholic school for the majority of my life. If I had never heard the theory there that it was God who brought about the alphabet, then it is probably no more that just that; a theory.

    ReplyDelete